Men's Aid logo
Need Help and Advice
Phone number
From 8am to 8pm 7 days a week
about usmembers onlyMegaPhonechat roomforum
AbductionChild Abusedomestic abusefamily lawfamily law reformFalse Allegationsfreedom of information
how to cpmplainhuman rightsmsbp/fiisex discrimination

 

Right for the wrong reasons

Is the criminal justice system - as the Prime Minister Tony Blair has argued - 'utterly useless for getting on top of 21st century crime' ?. The Crime and Society Foundation's online publication, 'Right for the wrong reasons' argues that whilst the Prime Minister is right to suggest that the criminal justice system is not working, his understanding of this failure is fundamentally flawed.

The government never tires of telling us that crime has fallen dramatically in recent years. So why do ministers claim that the criminal justice system is failing and needs radical reform? According to Right for the wrong reasons the criminal justice system is failing, but not for the reasons the government give. The real challenge involves giving up on the hopeless attempts to drive up criminal justice performance and seek a much broader array of solutions to crime than the criminal justice system can ever deliver.

The five key propositions are:

  1. Criminal justice reform and crime reduction are different policy challenges. It is a fundamental error to confuse reforming criminal justice with reducing crime.
  2. Crime is far more common, everyday and widespread than official statistics would have us believe.
  3. In the face of such widespread crime, the criminal justice system has very little impact.
  4. The criminal justice system does have a role. It is there to regulate certain types of crimes and criminals, rather than to resolve crime and make society safer.
  5. The crime reduction challenge involves being honest about the scale and nature of crime and related harms, and developing a far broader range of policies to address them than those afforded by the criminal justice system.

Download 'Right for the wrong reasons'

The paper is written by Richard Garside, Acting Director of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies and Chair of the Crime and Society Foundation. Following a roundtable discussion held in June 2006 with representatives from the penal reform sector, They would like to open up this discussion and debate to a broader range of people.

They want to stimulate debate and test their argument with those who have experience in academic, public policy or service provision in social policy and criminal justice fields. The Crime and Society Foundation would like to hear your views on the paper.

The Foundation will spend the summer of 2006 bringing together the contributions. In the autumn they will publish many of them online and a selection will be published in a final printed document. These will appear alongside 'Right for the wrong reasons' as a contribution to creating a broader public discussion and debate about the Government's approach to crime and criminal justice.

For more information on the Crime and Society Foundation and their ongoing work on ‘Right for the wrong reasons’, see their website at www.crimeandsociety.org.uk

----- Original Message -----
From: Anne Harris
To: richard@crimeandsociety.org.uk
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:47 PM
Subject: Modern Urban Myths - Domestic Violence Some Questions Answered.

Hi Richard,

I received an e-mail from your foundation today requesting views on the five central points contained in the paper 'Is the criminal justice system - as the Prime Minister has argued - 'utterly useless for getting on top of 21st century crime'? This has prompted me to contact you.

I am a voluntary domestic violence help-line worker for a registered charity called SNAP based in St Neots, Cambridgeshire which was founded fifteen years ago because there were no professional / voluntary organisations available in the area to help those suffering from domestic abuse. Although this is a social issue, at the start of our project it was even very difficult for women to receive the necessary help because some local authorities believed there couldn’t possibly be any abuse victims in our area.

According to government research, domestic violence is costing the UK £23bn yearly nearly all of which is spent on women as they are shown as being the victims and men the perpetrators. This contradicts our helpline experiences and thirty years of international research and studies that indicate overwhelmingly women are as violent towards men as men are towards women who are five times more likely to report the violence. However, although there is now the opportunity to acknowledge that both men and women can be violent and both can ill-treat children the Government will not change their policies.

To stop the appalling crime of domestic violence we have to address this and, also the problem of unstable relationships that are fuelling it even more. The Home Office has previously acknowledged that marital breakdown presents a key risk factor in domestic violence. In fact, the biggest protection against domestic violence and child abuse is marriage – the very institution that government is busy destroying along with men’s rights. By encouraging fatherlessness, this government is putting children last.

Research shows the root cause of the huge rise in anti-social behaviour and juvenile crime lies in family breakdown. Through this we are creating future perpetrators of domestic abuse who will be far more violent. SNAP has joined groups throughout the country and we have formed the Coalition for Equal Parenting and are lobbying all political parties to try and reverse the family breakdown trend. We are founder members of the Huntingdonshire Domestic Violence Forum and attend the ‘Friend’s’ committee that help raise funds for the refuge for women and children that was built through SNAP’s nine-year campaign. We liaise with drug/alcohol groups, and network with other local organisations - we deal with racial, religious and sexual hate crime discrimination through the Open Out Project. We have mentored young offenders and have a very good working relationship with local colleges’ community education tutors and youth workers. People, university students and professional organisations throughout the UK are contacting us for advice. Our helpline is open 12 hours daily each week.

Most members of society find abuse unacceptable and all have probably made contributions towards women’s safety. I would like to think that most people would not like anyone to suffer abuse. However, as I have already stated, domestic violence is a social problem made up of men, women and children victims and unless we look at it in a balanced way, we are never going to break the cycle of abuse.

Below is the link to our booklet that we've just had printed. This has been based on data gathered from the BCS, the ONS and Home Office statistics and research papers. In that regard it is unique in published information about domestic violence. I thought you may find it of interest:

Modern Urban Myths - Domestic Violence Some Questions Answered.pdf

http://www.mensaid.com/modern_urban_myths.htm

Vera Baird MP, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Dept of Constitutional Affairs (and a lawyer), has been minded to describe the booklet as "a masterpiece of self-serving inaccuracy".

Why, you must ask?

Particularly when her boss the Minister of State, Rt Hon Harriet Harman QC MP, has described the same booklet as " very impressive and wants you [St Neots] to keep up the good work".

Could it be that the booklet demolishes much of what Vera Baird has been advocating in the House and casts doubt on what is left standing ?

Yours cordially,
Anne Harris,
Voluntary Help-line Worker/Project Coordinator. Member Men's Aid

St. Neots Abuse Project(SNAP).

www.snapdomesticviolence.org.uk

 

If it’s broke, don’t fix it

By Richard Garside, Acting Director of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies at King's College London and is Chair of the Crime and Society Foundation. April 2006

The American political scientist Barrington Moore once warned against 'the tendency to accept uncritically the notion that the present generation has really settled certain questions more or less permanently'. In Moore's sights were those who considered that certain historical questions had been answered through historical enquiry; that further research was, in essence, little more than commentary.

To read more please visit http://www.crimeandsociety.org.uk/articles/ifbroke.html


This article was published in 'Whitehall and Westminster World' (April 2006) and is an abbreviated version of a pamphlet that will be published by the Crime and Society Foundation in the early summer.

 

Contact Webmaster

Comments for Men's Aid

complaint about Men's Aid

Registered charity No. 1116309
Men's Aid Head Office
57 Cornwall Grove
Bletchley
Milton Keynes
MK3 7HX
087 1223 9986

This Page Was Last Updated

Friday 23 February, 2007 13:03

Disclaimer