Men's Aid logo
Need Help and Advice
Phone number
From 8am to 8pm 7 days a week
about usmembers onlyMegaPhonechat roomforum
AbductionChild Abusedomestic abusefamily lawfamily law reformFalse Allegationsfreedom of information
how to cpmplainhuman rightsmsbp/fiisex discrimination

MSbP

Consensus Report

Consensus Update

9th November 2005
DCA consultation - Child Care Proceedings

5th September 2005
Forced fast-track adoption

19th July 2005
Mismanagement of Social and Family Policy

20th May 2005
Consensus Report

26th April 2005
Consensus Report

Press Articles

25th May 2006
Secret witch-hunt syndrome

24th May 2006
No names, no proof, no consensus

18th May 2006
No Consensus Over Mysterious Report

23rd April 2006
Innocent parents accused of abuse

30th August 2005
How social services can seize our children

20th August 2005
Stolen by the State

11th August 2005
Council rejects child snatcher claims

14th May 2005
Scandal of the stolen children

19th October 2004
It's getting worse for vulnerable parents

21st January 2004
New hope for parents who had children taken away

4th November 2003
New family protocol to speed up childcare cases

6th July 2003
Secret courts that steal our children



Council rejects 'child snatcher' claims

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/localgovernment/story/0,9061,1546989,00.html

Guardian - 11th August 2005

Essex county council today attacked media coverage of an adoption case which saw social workers branded as "child snatchers" for removing two children from a couple with low IQs.

A high court judge yesterday ruled that the couple must give up their four-year-old daughter and 14-month-old son because they were incapable of parenting. Mrs Justice Pauffley agreed with Essex social services that the children would be at risk if they continued to live at home.

The children were placed with foster parents last year. Essex councillor Tracey Chapman, cabinet member for children and families, rejected reports that the family was targeted by social services merely because the mother, 28, has learning difficulties. She can read and write, but has an IQ of 60 and difficulty in understanding ideas.

The councillor said the father, aged 37, also has a low IQ. Ms Chapman said the Daily Mail's coverage of the case, which referred to social workers as child snatchers, was unjustified. "It's incredibly demoralising for social workers to be attacked in this way.

The judge commended our handling of this case." The councillor said social services had done everything they could to keep the family together and provided them with up to 30 hours of support per week. But she said the parents had not been able to develop the skills to adequately care for their offspring.

The councillor said: "We put in as much support as we could to this family. Wherever possible we try to enable families to remain together, and that is what social workers tried to do in this case."

The case has highlighted concern that parents with learning disabilities are disproportionately likely to have their children taken into care. Recent research by retired academic Tim Booth, formerly chairman in sociological studies at Sheffield University, found that 15% of local authority care proceedings involved parents with learning disabilities.


 

Registered charity No. 1116309
Men's Aid Head Office
57 Cornwall Grove
Bletchley
Milton Keynes
MK3 7HX
087 1223 9986

This Page Was Last Updated

Monday 5 March, 2007 11:39

Disclaimer