Men's Aid logo
Need Help and Advice
Phone number
From 8am to 8pm 7 days a week
about usmembers onlyMegaPhonechat roomforum
AbductionChild Abusedomestic abusefamily lawfamily law reformFalse Allegationsfreedom of information
how to cpmplainhuman rightsmsbp/fiisex discrimination

Documents

PP - Conf
The 2003 reform


Project 157
2004 re-submission of the 2003 reform

HISTORY

THE DISCARDED PROGRAMME of FAMILY LAW REFORM

Contact Dispute Resolution [2003] Fam Law 455

29th April 2004
Hi-Jacking the Early Interventions project

17th May 2005
NAO Complaint Against the DfES Miscarriage of Family Policy

20th July 2004
PARENTAL SEPARATION: CHILDREN’S NEEDS AND PARENTS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

17th September 2004
Hodge says the aims of Family Resolutions do not differ now from the original proposal

November 2004
Fam Law [2004] 835

13th December 2004 Summary of the Parliamentary Debate on contact

14th December 2004
Lord Filkin - Family Resolutions has not abandoned the principles of Early Interventions

7th January 2005
Phyllis Starkey MP wont Help

2nd March 2005
No Abandonment of NATC EIP

17th May 2005
DfES Design Team Minutes

21st July 2005
what happened to the NATC Early Interventions project

20th September 2005
Sir David Normington DfES response to the Consensus complaint

14th October 2005
Sir David Normington DfES The Children and Adoption Bill

3rd November 2005
Ministers are aware of the Bruce Clark investigation

9th Novenber 2005
Children and Adoption Bill - DfES Briefing

23rd December 2005
Sally Field - ministers where not misled and family policy was not distorted

20th January 2006
Family Resolutions and the NATC Early Interventions project are not the same

2 June 2006
Basic policy errors

12th June 2006
Compulsion required for mediation to work, concludes Constitutional Affairs Committee

PRESS ARTICLES

27th October 2003
Father time

30th December 2003
Family courts failing children

25th March 2004
Why are we afraid of seeing fair play ?

2nd April 2004
Judge backs angry fathers over contact with children

30th May 2004
Listen to the children, Mrs Hodge

20th September 2004 Parliament launches review of family court cases

30th November 2004 'Parenting plans' to give separated fathers better access to children

19th January 2005
Putting mummy in the stocks

25th January 2005
Family Mediation: Government parenting plans condemned by contact experts

2nd March 2005
Fathers get raw deal on child access, say MPs

3rd April 2005
Only six couples sign up for Hodge's £1m mediation scheme

3rd May 2005
Family Law: Activists complain about DfES official

27th June 2005
Divorce mediation scheme flops

13th November 2005 Divorced parents to be given automatic access to children

4th June 2006
Family Courts are more Secret than our Prisons and that must change

PARENTAL SEPARATION: CHILDREN’S NEEDS AND PARENTS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

http://www.dfes.gov.uk/childrensneeds/

20th July 2004

Major new proposals to create a better family justice system for separating parents and their children were unveiled today.

Parental Separation: Children’s Needs and Parents’ Responsibilities outlines how the Government will better support families who are going through separation.

It details a range of measures, including better information for parents, Parenting Plans to help parents make good arrangements, in-court conciliation and mediation for those parents who do go to court, active judicial management and stronger powers for judges to enforce court orders.

Constitutional Affairs Secretary Lord Falconer said:

“We have taken a thoughtful, radical look at the current system. This is a strong package of proposals which will make a significant difference. We intend to implement the necessary changes as soon as possible.

“The law states that the child’s interests are paramount. That will not change. The Government strongly believes that children need both parents - these proposals will make it more likely that children will continue to have two parents.”

The consultation paper proposes:

• Better information and advice for separating parents.
• Developing and promoting Parenting Plans to guide parents.
• Targeting legal aid to promote earlier, more consensual resolution and less litigation.
• Better processes to investigate harm issues.
• Extending in-court conciliation to all cases, before formal court hearings.
• Giving judges the power to direct parents to in-court conciliation and mediation.
• Piloting ‘Collaborative Law’.
• Piloting more intensive intervention – the Family Resolution Pilot Project for more difficult cases.
• A new role for the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) towards active problem-solving.
• Supporting strong judicial management of cases with faster hearings.
• Active monitoring of court orders to ensure they are complied with.
• Legislation to give the judiciary stronger enforcement powers.

Lord Falconer said:

“Parents will be helped and encouraged to come to their own arrangements. But, when they cannot, the courts will play a role. These family cases will be resolved in a swift and effective manner, while the courts will be more aware of domestic violence allegations.

“Already 90 per cent of separating couples come to their own arrangements for their children. But we want to help more parents to do so. That way, the process is less adversarial, faster and parents are more likely to stick to an agreement they have come to themselves than one imposed by a judge.

“But when courts do make orders we will give judges the tools they need to ensure they are respected.

“There cannot and will not be an automatic presumption of 50/50 contact. Children cannot be divided like the furniture or the CD collection. It’s more complex than that.”

Charles Clarke, Secretary of State at the Department for Education and Skills, said:

"The Green Paper paves the way for improved services for families undergoing separation and providing the necessary support to help them and their children through a very difficult time. That is why our focus is on what children need and how the Government can help parents in meeting that need.

“We know that mediation and conciliation can often make a real difference to resolving contact issues and preventing couples from going to court in the first place which is far better for both the parents and the child.

“That is why CAFCASS will play a major role in delivering these services, concentrating their resources on contact for children, both during the time of court applications and beyond, including the prompt return of cases to the courts when a ruling has not been followed.”

Patricia Hewitt, Secretary of State at the Department for Trade and Industry, said:

"We have led the way in making it easier for parents to get a better balance between work and family life, so I warmly welcome this Green Paper as another step forward in ensuring both fathers, and mothers, can play a vital role in their children's lives, even after separation.

"With fathers already doing a third of all childcare in the family it is vital that they have the opportunity to continue that role if they separate or divorce. Children do best when they have the love and practical support of both their parents, whether or not their parents are living together."

Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss DBE, President of the Family Division, has written today to all family judges to improve the resolution of private law family cases in the courts. The President, the Court Service and CAFCASS are working to implement key changes in court systems and processes as soon as practicable.

Parental Separation: Children's Needs and Parents' Responsibilities, Green Paper. Download the document: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/childrensneeds/docs/DfesChildrensNeeds.pdf

 

 

 

 

Contact Webmaster

Comments for Men's Aid

complaint about Men's Aid

Registered charity No. 1116309
Men's Aid Head Office
28, Penryn Road
Walsall
WS5 3EU
087 1223 9986

This Page Was Last Updated

Wednesday 25 October, 2006 20:22

Disclaimer