Men's Aid logo
Need Help and Advice
Phone number
From 8am to 8pm 7 days a week
about usmembers onlyMegaPhonechat roomforum
AbductionChild Abusedomestic abusefamily lawfamily law reformFalse Allegationsfreedom of information
how to cpmplainhuman rightsmsbp/fiisex discrimination

Family LawChildren's Act 1989Children's Act 2004Children and Adoption BillOpen JusticeNATC EI ProjectFamily Justice InquiryConsensus ReportDivorceFamily Law AdviceFamily Law LiteratureDiscussion

Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown

The Law Commission’s consultation paper “Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown” was published on 31 May 2006.

The Government has asked the Law Commission to examine the options for reforming the law that applies to cohabiting couples on separation and death. We are publishing this consultation paper to invite the public’s views on the difficult issues raised and so assist us in making recommendations to Parliament for reform.

Stuart Bridge, the Commissioner leading the project, said

"More people live together outside marriage than ever before. The law that applies if cohabitants separate is unacceptably complex. It often gives rise to results that many people would consider unfair."

"We believe that there is a strong case for introducing more suitable financial remedies where cohabiting couples have children, and possibly in other circumstances."

"We hope that this consultation paper will provide a basis for discussion about (1)whether there should be reform; (2) if so, how a new scheme of remedies between cohabitants could be designed; and (3) to whom it should apply."

The consultation paper rejects the view that cohabitants should have access to the financial regime that applies on divorce. Instead, it proposes a self-standing scheme of financial remedies for certain cohabitants on separation available only in strictly limited circumstances. The scheme would not apply to all cohabiting couples.

The consultation period continues until 30 September 2006.

Key issues
The project looks at people who are living together in relationships bearing the hallmarks of intimacy and exclusivity, but who are not married to each other or who have not formed a civil partnership (the status available to same-sex couples who register their relationship).

The project concentrates in particular on the following issues:

  • Whether cohabitants should have access to any remedies providing periodical payments, lump sums, or transfers of property from one party to the other when they separate.
  • A review of the operation of existing remedies providing capital awards (such as lump sums and property transfers) for the benefit of children under the Children Act 1989.
Scope of the project
In order to keep the present project manageable, and to produce recommendations closely tailored to the particular needs of this category of relationship, our work focuses solely on cohabitants.

This project therefore does not consider:

  • Relationships between blood relatives or "caring" relationships.
  • "Commercial" relationships (landlord and tenant or lodger).
  • Parental responsibility - This has been recently considered and legislated upon in the Adoption and Children Act 2002.
  • Next of kin rights - The Department of Health has recently amended its policy guidance to NHS staff to extend consultation with next of kin to include unmarried partners.
  • Insolvency, tax and social security - The Department for Constitutional Affairs has indicated that a consideration of these issues would not address the most immediate policy needs.
  • Child support - The Child Support Act applies to all non-resident parents of qualifying children, regardless of the nature of the relationship between the parents (whether spouses, civil partners, cohabitants or none of those). Any debate about the operation of the Child Support system is beyond the remit of the Law Commission.
  • Whether, where a cohabitant dies without a will (intestate), the surviving partner should have automatic rights to inherit. The law currently gives surviving spouses an automatic inheritance in such circumstances. Cohabitants can normally only benefit from the estate in such cases if the courts (under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975) grant them a discretionary award on the basis of their needs.
  • A review of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 as it applies to cohabitants and their children.
  • Whether contracts between cohabitants, setting out how they will share their property in the event of the relationship ending, should be legally enforceable, and, if so, in what circumstances.

The scope of this project and further information are available from http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/cohabitation.htm.

Download the Consultation paper

Download an overview

Men's Aid response Q & A

Men's Aid full response

Cheltnam Group Response

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel.Robinson@LAWCOMMISSION.GSI.GOV.UK
Sent: 19 October 2006 15:29
To: robert.whiston@ukonline.co.uk
Subject: Cohabitation - compiling a response

Dear Mr Whiston

Thank you very much for your response to the Law Commission's consultation
paper, Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown.

The views of Men's Aid will be taken into account in formulating our final
report, due to be published in August 2007.

Yours sincerely,

Dan Robinson

Research Assistant
Property, Family and Trust Law Team
The Law Commission
Conquest House
37-38 John Street
Theobalds Road
London
WC1N 2BQ
daniel.robinson@lawcommission.gsi.gov.uk

 

Contact Webmaster

Comments for Men's Aid

complaint about Men's Aid

Registered charity No. 1116309
Men's Aid Head Office
57 Cornwall Grove
Bletchley
Milton Keynes
MK3 7HX
087 1223 9986

This Page Was Last Updated

Monday 6 November, 2006 11:16

Disclaimer